"I told my family and loved ones, this homeland is too small for you, you should rule the world."
Syrian Member of Parliament addressing President Bashar al-Assad.
I cannot express enough the disappointment I still feel several hours after President Bashar al-Assad's long-awaited speech. What a let-down it was.
I had fully expected him to say something of substance, to meet the expectations of not only his people but other regional statesmen who do not want Syria to go the way of Yemen and Libya.
But it was a vintage Baathist display that belonged in the 1960s and 70s: arrogant, intransigent, uncompromising, full of accusations of plots, conspiracies and blaming others. It was completely devoid of any apology for the shortcomings of the regime or admission of responsibility for the dozens of deaths of unarmed protesters. Not even "God rest their souls".
I really hoped for something different but I now admit; I was naive. I regret wasting an hour of my time listening to this drivel.
Perhaps Bashar al-Assad is a hostage of his father's regime. What he did not say but is now obvious is that Syria's Baathist regime is beyond redemption. I suppose the Syrian regime may interpret this statement as being anti-regime! Actually, it's pro-Syria, a truly strong, progressive, respectful and respectable and forward-looking and -moving Syria.
While the Gulf states, Europe and the US, and their media, have been careful not to add to the pressure with the Gulf countries even expressing their support for Bashar Assad, this is a matter for the Syrian people to decide. It is they who will judge if the pale-looking Bashar al-Assad's speech in the rubber-stamp parliament is acceptable. What a shameful display of hypocrisy on the part of these so-called representatives of the people. The Arab world is too small for you, you deserve to rule the world! I know King Philip told Alexander, "My son, ask for thyself another kingdom, for that which I leave is too small for thee," but Alexander earned the title "The Great" in his 13 year rule and achieved a legacy with action, not posturing or words.
I am not Syrian but it really irks me to hear the chants of birroh biddam nafdeeka ya Bashar, ie we will die for you Bashar. To have had to listen to the contrived poetry of hero worship and the atmosphere of imposed veneration that belongs in Kim-Il-sung's North Korea, let alone Kim-Jong-il's...
I guess April Fools' Day came 2 days early this year, and I was the fool.
The regime in Damascus has responded to the unrest in the country by offering a large carrot and several medium-sized ones at the end of a very long stick. The large carrot is the declaration that emergency law, in place for almost half a century, will be lifted. The other carrots include granting more political and press freedoms.
I find a problem with this; the idiom carrot and stick deals with donkeys which are much abused and misunderstood animals in the Middle East. But we are talking about human beings here. The Syrians are a proud people with an old and glorious history demanding basic human rights of which they have been deprived for far too long. What the Syrian government has announced is not a reward or concession to the people; it is an inherent right that has been withheld for decades by the Baathist regime through force, fear, repression and intimidation.
The regime has not even set a timetable for any of these reforms and it seems to be desperately shopping for time while trying to figure out what to do. Time is exactly what US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton gifted Damascus on Sunday when she said that Syria is not Libya and the US is not contemplating intervention in Syria. The message clearly is we're going to stay out of your way and give you a chance to sort this out. What was left unsaid, in my opinion, is that there's a hidden invoice attached to this American position. Significantly, the Gulf countries have expressed their support for the regime in Damascus and media, Arab and international, has dealt with events in Syria with a much lighter touch than the one used with Yemen, or Libya. Of course American, and world, inaction on Syria is contingent upon the end of the lethal violence used to suppress the protests leaving dozens of Syrians dead and wounded.
I am not impressed with the demonstrations today held in several Syrian cities in support of the regime . I'm not denying the fact that the regime has supporters; rather, it is always very easy in the Arab world to organize large scale pro-government and -leadership demonstrations. Especially when you declare it a school holidayThese have been very well rehearsed and oft-repeated exercises in public adoration for leaders across the Arab world. I had an uncle working in Kuwait when Iraq invaded and occupied the country. One day the Iraqis decided to organize a demonstration in support of their annexation of Kuwait. My uncle happened to be walking down a street where the march was taking place when he was grabbed by the "organizers" and told to march along and chant. And sure enough, there he was later that evening making an appearance on Iraqi TV as part of the demonstration even though he despised what Saddam had done.
It's to come out in significant numbers voicing opposition that takes a lot of doing in this region.
The Syrian regime has been quick to blame the upheaval on foreign elements, a plot, a conspiracy targeting the stability of Syria. It's a repeat of the accusations leveled by the regimes of Ben Ali, Mubarak, Gaddafi and Ali Abdullah Saleh. Damascus has also raised the fearsome specter of sectarianism in the country. Syria is ruled by the minority Alawites who first came to power with the ascent in 1966 of Salah Jadid as the strongman of the regime.
I find it heartening that there have been several marches and calls in the name of national unity, decrying all forms of sectarianism. It would be naive and erroneous to claim that one particular sect is united in its support for or opposition to the regime.
While the Alawites do hold the reins of power in the country, they are backed by Sunnis. I believe the history of Syria in the 20th Century should be viewed in terms of pre- and post-Hafez al-Assad and pre- and post-Hama.
The Hama massacre in 1982, which I referred to in previous posts, was an armed insurrection by the Muslim Brotherhood against the regime of Hafez al-Assad. It was preceded for several years by a campaign of terror by the Brotherhood, including an assassination attempt on Assad himself, and met with equal brutality and suppression by the regime. In early February 1982 the Muslim Brotherhood declared open jihad against the Baathist regime and took control of Hama. What followed was a brutal fight to the death. It ended with the regime crushing the rebellion, in the process claiming the lives of several thousand people, with the generally accepted figure ranging between 10,000 and 25,000 killed, mostly civilians.
That's why it is important the coexistence proponents be given a platform by the media. The struggle in Syria has never been sectarian; it's always been a power struggle. We should not forget that when Hafez al-Assad mounted his coup d'etat, aka Corrective Movement, in 1970, he imprisoned regime strongman and Alawite compatriot Salah Jadid as well as the Sunni figurehead president Nureddin al-Atassi. Jadid languished in jail for 23 years until he died there in 1993. Atassi was released due to ill health in 1992 and died of cancer less than 2 months later. The Alawites in Syria must not as a sect be held responsible for the sins of the regime or what happened in Hama. They as a group have their own dissidents and critics of the regime, for example Aref Dalila. They have contributed to the enrichment of Arab culture and literature with the creativity of people like the poet Adonis and the playwright Saadallah Wannous.
I hope that what is happening in Syria is an opportunity for the country to move forward and open up to the world. Even if the protests do die down for the time being the regime should be under no illusion that the storm has passed. The desire for freedom is overwhelming and irrepressible.
President Bashar is faced with some very tough choices now. The resignation of the government, in my opinion, is not a deal clincher. The issue is changing the nature of the regime. Can it change?
This is a matter for the Syrian people to decide. We observers and commentators can write and offer our opinions. But what I really wish for, is that Syria and the other Arab countries can offer their people a dignified existence with all the accompanying freedoms. The dignity of standing alone, being the symbol of resistance to foreign plots and enemies, that only get you so far. It does not put food on the table, build a progressive educational system, erect proper infrastructure, encourage first-class healthcare...
In 1983 an 18-year-old student by the name of Kefah Mokbel achieved a 100% score on the Syrian Baccalaureate exam, a first in the history of Syria. He was personally congratulated by President Hafez al-Assad. Today he is one of the world's top breast cancer surgeons. Unfortunately he is based in London, not Damascus. When Foreign Minister (now Vice-President) Farouk al-Sharaa underwent open heart surgery it was performed in Beirut, not Syria.
Egypt can claim Farouk Baz and Ahmed Zuweil as eminent Egyptians who emigrated and never returned. Every Arab country has similar success stories of citizens who rose to prominence and were truly valued abroad. The reason is about more than academics. It is about an atmosphere that holds freedoms sacred, encourages creativity and rewards pioneers in various fields. Secularism is not tantamount to heresy and does not aim to eradicate faith, women's rights do not lead to loose morals, personal liberties are not an affront to unity, individualism does not negate social cohesion, opposition does not imply treason and realism does not equate defeatism.
It is up to the Arab world to decide if the revolt taking shape within its borders has a place for such convictions. Syria is not the first country nor will it be the last in this chain of tumultuous events. The late President Hafez al-Assad coined the phrase, "Peace of the Brave". I hope the Arab leaders are brave enough to make peace with their societies; shooting at them does not take much courage. The loyalty and devotion of the people out of conviction will make for a much stronger and more united home front than the one that has suffered defeat after defeat for decades, even centuries.
I did not realize that his orders were not being obeyed anymore.
US Envoy Philip Habib on hearing that a promise of a ceasefire obtained by Habib from Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin has been violated by Defense Minister Ariel Sharon, 1982.
Yesterday Syrian President Bashar al-Assad pledged through his spokeswoman, Bothaina Shaaban, that peaceful protests would not be put down with lethal force. Today up to a dozen Syrians, perhaps 2 dozen, have been killed when security forces opened fire on demonstrators. Which makes me wonder if President Bashar actually did give the order not to fire on protesters, if he meant it or if his power does not extend to the notoriously omnipotent and feared Syrian security services.
President Bashar has the dubious distinction of being the Arab world's first dynastic president of a republic, taking over upon the death in 2000 of his father Hafez al-Assad.
I must admit that Bashar has many fans in Syria, viewed as the New Young Hope. Unfortunately he has not lived up to that hope. In his 11 years in power he has liberalized the economy and moved the country to a capitalist market system.
But Syria still languishes under an emergency law that dates back to 1963 that bans most forms of dissent and public expression. That's 48 years to you and me, half a century. The best the President could offer yesterday was a promise to study repealing the emergency law.
The system in Syria is inherently corrupt and the terror spread by the security services among the population is well-documented.
President Bashar famously said back in January that Syria was stable and immune from the upheaval witnessed in Tunisia and Egypt, "Because you have to be very closely linked to the beliefs of the people. This is the core issue."
Obviously Syria is witnessing violent upheaval despite the President's convictions (?) and vehement denials of Elias Murad, President of the Syrian Journalists Union, who claimed tonight that the news is being fabricated and no one was killed today and the demonstrations taking place were in support of the president.
Syria, perhaps more so than any other Arab country except Egypt, is a crucial Arab state. President Bashar is now faced with the most serious challenge to his rule in 11 years. He will doubtless be closely watching the reaction of the mercantile Sunni class in Damascus. Any widespread discontent in the Syrian capital will spell big trouble for the regime.
The New Young Hope still has a chance to recover the situation. He should learn from the mistakes of Ben Ali, Mubarak Ali Saleh and Gaddafi; once the genie gets out of the bottle it is impossible to shove it back in, no matter how much firepower, repression and brutality are used.
His cultured wife Asma recently told Vogue magazine, "It's about everyone taking shared responsibility in moving this country forward. … We all have a stake in this country; it will be what we make it."
The people are calling for freedom, sadly Assad's supporters are chanting a variation of the Colonel's Unholy Trinity, "God, Bashar and Syria."
I do not believe those claiming that the Syrian regime has brought in Hezbollah gunmen to quell the uprising. While Syria does wage its battles in Lebanon and Palestine by proxy I am certain that it deals with its own problems on home turf.
Ultimately, Syrian blood is being spilled on Syrian soil and not for the liberation of the Golan. It's a country that holds so much promise and yet has underachieved for far too long.
Perhaps President Bashar has the time, will and the powers to enable him to guide Syria towards a more open and democratic system where his closest relatives no longer reek of corruption and have their fingers in every pie, where Syria is no longer a one-party state, where a 19-year-old blogger is no longer accused of being a woman of loose morals and an agent of the CIA, where citizens don't whisper their discontent and look over their shoulders and where gunmen in civilian clothing act like God on Earth with the power to make people disappear into terrible dungeons and endure the most brutal of torture.
In Tunisia, Egypt, Yemen and Libya the leaders were always a step behind. In Syria the writing is on the wall. If not dealt with wisely the situation may turn out to be more terrible than the chaos of Yemen and Libya combined.
Syrian TV has broadcast images of weapons and ammunition which it said were found in the mosque at the center of the anti-regime protests.
So I'm wondering, if the protesters had all these guns and ammo, how come is it they didn't shoot back at the security forces when they stormed the mosque and killed 5 protesters and a doctor? Strange, huh!
The UN-sanctioned military action against Colonel Gaddafi's forces has begun. What we're going to see is a rolling back of his troops all the way back to Tripoli, or to possibly Sirte, ie the area of historical Tripolitania. Meanwhile the rebel army will be tasked with the chore of proving its mettle, something it has yet to do.
I'm not sure exactly what's happening on the ground. Yesterday we were told that Gaddafi troops were fighting their way into Benghazi, yet the Americans said they were 160 km away.
I never saw any proof of mercenaries fighting for Gaddafi and talk of that has died down.
Right now the situation looks a lot like the old Ottoman vilayets of Tripolitania and Cyrenaica.
It is up to the rebels to prove they're not a rabble. Or worse.
The anti-Gaddafi camp must now prove its mettle and make use of the military imbalance that has shifted in its favor.
Meanwhile Tripoli broadcast 2 audio-only speeches by Muammar al-Gaddafi after the beginning of the bombing campaign against his forces. I was immediately struck by the disembodied voice and immediately reminded of that of Saddam Hussein after the beginning of Desert Storm. But there is a big difference: Saddam was viewed by millions of Arabs, rightly or wrongly, as a leader, Gaddafi is seen as a nutcase.
Unlike Saddam who called on the Iraqi people to "Fight them". Gaddafi did not call upon his people to resist. I find that strange, but not unexpected from someone like him. He did say that he was arming the Libyan people now (as if he would take that chance).
What is certain is that this military action cannot last indefinitely. Otherwise it will risk alienating Arab public opinion which is at the worst non-committal so far.
Not so Amr Moussa, the Secretary General of the Arab League who after suspending Libya from the League and calling for a No-Fly Zone now seems to be having second thoughts.
Today he said, "What is happening in Libya differs from the aim of imposing a no-fly zone, and what we want is the protection of civilians and not the bombardment of more civilians."
Well, I'm sorry, Mr Moussa. What did you think a No-Fly Zone means? You were Foreign Minister of Egypt when a No-Fly Zone was imposed on Iraq and should know full well what it means. The first targets were inevitably going to be Libya's air defenses and command and control structures followed by Gaddafi's armor on the ground.
I wonder if this about-face is not somehow connected to Moussa's prospective candidacy in the upcoming presidential elections in Egypt. You know those elections, the ones to choose a replacement for Hosni Mubarak whom Amr Moussa served for 10 years as Foreign Minister.
King Abdullah today announced huge stipends that included substantial amounts for healthcare, the unemployed, security forces and the religious establishment. Huge amounts of cash but not exactly the reforms that are being called for.
Just heard a professor of political science, Wahid Hamza Hashem, at the King Abdul Aziz University tell the BBC that it is the duty of Muslims to obey the guardian (king) and be obedient. I wonder what curriculum he teaches.
Meanwhile in Bahrain where mainly Saudi forces deployed a couple of days ago and the protest movement was crushed the government has demolished Pearl Roundabout.
I always said that the 25 km-long King Fahd Causeway linking Bahrain and Saudi Arabia was built specifically for this reason: to allow the quick deployment of Saudi troops.
Syria has seen its first real protests today in various parts of the country with reports of deaths ranging between 2 and 4 so far. No one is immune! The Arab people all share the same misery and disgruntlement.
Terrible scenes in Yemen today were at least 42 demonstrators were shot dead. It's a massacre. President Ali Abdullah Saleh says there were no security forces present where this mass killing in cold blood took place. You know, even if I believed him and I don't, he is responsible.
These Arab leaders never learn.
Colonel Gaddafi in his latest talk, delivered over the radio, has told Benghazi that his forces are coming tomorrow and will show no mercy to anyone bearing arms against him.
He knows that he's racing against the clock with the UN security Council about to vote on a No-Fly zone over Libya.
Gaddafi has agents within Benghazi and I expect them to make trouble. They have already proven that they exist with the targeted attack on the Al Jazeera crew that killed cameraman Ali al-Jaber. But I doubt he can carry the fight all the way there over such long lines.
Doubtless he will attack from the air and sea but while I'm not a military expert I doubt his will to carry out a purposeful and sustained land campaign so far away from home base leaving both his headquarters and best forces exposed and extending his supply lines over territory that he has yet to take complete control of.
A man on a long journey through a perpetual desert.
The opinions expressed in this blog are mine and mine alone. They do not represent the views of any of my employers, past, present or future.